It's nice to give people constructive feedback and reasons why they didn't get the job, but sometimes it can be risky to try to explain it and as far as I am aware you don't have to give a detailed reason as to why you did not employ someone.
However, it would be easier to explain and/or defend if you have a structured, behavioural interviewing process, with questions designed to explore both the technical and "soft" skills required for the job, with an explanation of what evidence you are looking for in each case. This way you can rank candidates against one another, but you also need to define what is considered critical to the job and the organisation and what would rule someone out regardless of other candidates.
|