Quote:
Originally Posted by cocacolaking
But the 'first' of the two warnings was for something over a month ago. I believe if I had received the initial warning, the second would have never occurred.
|
While I am no expert on the law, given that the warnings were for exactly the same thing I believe you have a very valid argument. A warning is just what it says - "don't do that again or else". By giving you two warnings at once they have deprived you of the opportunity to learn from the first warning and modify your behaviour.
Giving you the two warnings at once suggests they're gunning for you. But frankly if they dismissed you on the basis of these two warnings I suspect they would come unstuck if you challenged it.