Newshound
10-07-2013, 01:27 PM
In Ferguson v WorkCover Queensland [2013] QSC 78 (27 March 2013) (Ferguson case), Justice Applegarth of the Supreme Court of Queensland considered the interaction between the Queensland and New South Wales workers’ compensation acts. [1]
In particular, the decision addresses what it means to ‘usually work’ or to be ‘usually based’ in a particular state or states.
Read more... (http://www.dibbsbarker.com/publication/Workers_Compensation__Which_act_applies_when_an_in jured_worker_usually_works_in_both_QLD_and_NSW.asp x)
In particular, the decision addresses what it means to ‘usually work’ or to be ‘usually based’ in a particular state or states.
Read more... (http://www.dibbsbarker.com/publication/Workers_Compensation__Which_act_applies_when_an_in jured_worker_usually_works_in_both_QLD_and_NSW.asp x)